<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mission: Accountable &#187; Contributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionaccountable.com/tag/contributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com</link>
	<description>a blog for tax-exempt organizaitons serving the needs of Ft Worth and surrounding communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Compliance Requirements for UPMIFA</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/05/20/compliance-requirements-for-upmifa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/05/20/compliance-requirements-for-upmifa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashlee Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endowments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Charity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State of Texas adopted the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) effective September 1, 2007.  UPMIFA replaces the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) which was approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1972 and adopted by the State of Texas in 1989. UPMIFA was developed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State of Texas adopted the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) effective September 1, 2007.  UPMIFA replaces the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) which was approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1972 and adopted by the State of Texas in 1989.</p>
<p>UPMIFA was developed to improve the protection of donor intent with respect to expenditures from endowments and applies to charities organized as charitable trusts or as nonprofit corporations and trusts managed by charities. The Act does not apply to funds managed by trustees that are not charities or trusts managed by corporate or individual trustees. UPMIFA provides guidance and authority to charitable organizations concerning the management and investment of funds held by those organizations and imposes additional duties on those who manage and invest charitable funds to provide additional protection for charities and also protect the interests of donors who want to see their contributions used wisely. The Act updates the rules governing expenditures from endowment funds, whether donor restricted or board designated, to provide stricter guidelines on spending endowment funds and to give institutions the ability to cope more easily with fluctuations in the value of the endowment.</p>
<p>In addition to identifying factors that a charity must consider in making management and investment decisions, UPMIFA requires a charity and those who manage and invest its funds to 1) give primary consideration to donor intent as expressed in a gift instrument, 2) act in good faith, with the care an ordinarily prudent person would exercise, 3) incur only reasonable costs in investing and managing charitable funds, 4) make a reasonable effort to verify relevant facts, 5) make decisions about each asset in the context of the portfolio of investments, as part of an overall investment strategy, 6) diversify investments unless due to special circumstances, the purposes of the fund are better served without diversification, 7) dispose of unsuitable assets, and 8) in general, develop an investment strategy appropriate for the fund and the charity.</p>
<p>Has your organization adopted an investment policy that complies with your state&#8217;s version of UPMIFA? Review your state&#8217;s requirements and make sure your policies conform to the prudent management of funds.</p>
<p>For additional information see <a href="http://www.upmifa.org">http://www.upmifa.org</a>.</p>
<p>For the State of Texas version of UPMIFA see <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/PR/htm/PR.163.htm">http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/PR/htm/PR.163.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/05/20/compliance-requirements-for-upmifa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey on Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/02/04/how-has-your-church-fared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/02/04/how-has-your-church-fared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Shellum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=1835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s be really honest &#8211; year-end giving wasn&#8217;t exactly what we hoped for. In a recent study conducted by the Barna Group, 57% of pastors surveyed said the economy had negatively impacted their church compared to last year. The good news is that only 8% of church leaders said the economic impact was &#8220;very negative,&#8221; and 9% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be really honest &#8211; year-end giving wasn&#8217;t exactly what we hoped for. In a recent <a href="http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/18-congregations/327-the-economys-impact-on-churches-congregational-budgets-part-1-of-3" target="_blank">study</a> conducted by the <a href="http://www.barna.org/" target="_blank">Barna Group</a>, 57% of pastors surveyed said the economy had negatively impacted their church compared to last year. The good news is that only 8% of church leaders said the economic impact was &#8220;very negative,&#8221; and 9% actually described last year as financially positive. Even if your not one of the 57%, you&#8217;re probably not as comfortable going into 2010 as you&#8217;d like to be.</p>
<p>So what can churches do to weather this environment? Here&#8217;s a few suggestions:<span id="more-1835"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><em>Don&#8217;t abandon your mission, and certainly don&#8217;t abandon your message</em>. Despite this economy, I believe (and have seen) that people still want to give generously to causes they are passionate about. The problem caused by the economy is that more nonprofit organizations are providing more services to more people in need with less available funding. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so important to trumpet a compelling vision to your contributors. There are simply more options for donors to consider, and with limited resources, they give to causes they are the most passionate about.</li>
<li><em>Communicate, communicate, communicate</em>. Churches (and lots of other organizations) make the mistake of not wanting to communicate negative financial trends and results. But if you don&#8217;t communicate, how will your contributors know there&#8217;s a need? Many churches also make the mistake of talking about money only when the numbers are down. Generosity is ultimately a spiritual issue not a financial one, and that message is lost if you only talk about money in a bad economy.</li>
<li><em>Rethink budgets</em>. Churches are generally very slow to make difficult decisions about (i.e. cutting) budgets, minstries, and staff. The line between faith and stewardship is often very faint, but in a giving environment like we&#8217;re experiencing now, churches must consider the efficiency of their ministries. When giving is up year after year after year, churches often add a little more &#8220;flair&#8221; to ministries than is really needed and let certain ministries linger on a little longer than they should. Spend some time thinking strategically about your ministries in light of your mission and your investment in those ministries, and you might be surprised what you find.</li>
</ol>
<p>The economy we&#8217;ve been dealt presents its share of challenges for churches and ministries, but there are opportunities to impact the quality and direction of your ministries. And who knows &#8211; you might even find youself in the 9% next year.</p>
<p>If we can be of any help or answer any questions as you wrestle through these issues, please don&#8217;t hesitate to call me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2010/02/04/how-has-your-church-fared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conditional Promises to Give</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/18/conditional-promises-to-give/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/18/conditional-promises-to-give/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Perkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't/United Way Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Schools and Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public/Private Foundations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pledges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promises to give]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed in &#8220;Unconditional Promises to Give&#8221; post, promises to give can be unconditional or conditional. Conditional promises to give come with donor-imposed conditions. If the condition is not met, the donor is not obligated to fulfill the promise to give. If the donor has already fulfilled the promise but the condition is never met, the donor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As discussed in &#8220;<a href="http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/07/unconditional-promises-to-give/">Unconditional Promises to Give</a>&#8221; post, promises to give can be unconditional or conditional. Conditional promises to give come with <span style="text-decoration: underline;">donor-imposed conditions</span>. If the condition is not met, the donor is not obligated to fulfill the promise to give. If the donor has already fulfilled the promise but the condition is never met, the donor has a right to have the assets returned to them.</p>
<p>Conditional promises to give are recognized only when the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">conditions are satisfied</span>. Therefore, no revenue or receivable should be recognized at the time the promise is received. If any assets are received prior to the conditions being met, the assets should be accounted for as a refundable advance (liability). Once the condition is met, the liability is removed and revenue is recognized.</p>
<p>Additional disclosures must be made regarding promises to give. When disclosing <strong>conditional promises to give</strong>, you should disclose the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>the total of the amounts promised; and</li>
<li>a description and amount for each group of promises having similar characteristics, such as promises conditioned on establishing new programs, completing a new building, or raising matching gifts by a specified date.<span id="more-1452"></span></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Summary of Unconditional vs. Conditional Promises to Give</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> </td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Unconditional</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Conditional</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Definition</strong></td>
<td valign="top">No conditions</td>
<td valign="top">Donor-imposed conditions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Timing of Recognition</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Recognize when received</td>
<td valign="top">Recognized when conditions have been met</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Measurement</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Fair value</td>
<td valign="top">Fair value</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Disclosure</strong></td>
<td valign="top">1) Amount receivable in less than one year, in 1 to 5 years, and in more than 5 years<br />
2) Amount of allowance for uncollectible promises</td>
<td valign="top">1) Total amount<br />
2) Description and amount of each group of promises with similar conditions</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> The following are e</strong><strong>xamples of promises to give:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><em>Unconditional or Conditional?</em></p>
<li>Donor promises to give $50,000 &#8211; <em>Unconditional</em></li>
<li>Donor promises to give $50,000 if donee raises $100,000 in contributions – <em>Conditional</em></li>
<li>Donor promises to give $50,000 if donee&#8217;s expenses for Program A are $100,000 or greater &#8211; <em>Conditional</em></li>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Conditional Disclosure 1:</em></p>
<p align="left">A trustee has agreed to match contributions to the Entity&#8217;s endowment funds on a one-for-two basis until the total reaches $5,000,000. In addition, a contributor has pledged to contribute $250,000, conditional upon proper matching with a grant.</p>
<p align="left"><em>Conditional Disclosure 2:</em></p>
<p>During 20X7, the Entity received restricted grants totaling $50,000 that contained donor conditions (primarily matching funds requirements). Since these grants represent conditional promises to give, they are not recorded as contribution revenue until donor conditions are met. Funds received from the donor in advance of the conditions being met totaled $20,000; are recorded as refundable advances; and will subsequently be recognized as contribution revenue when donor conditions are met.</p>
<p>For more information see &#8220;<a href="http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/07/unconditional-promises-to-give/">Unconditional Promises to Give</a>&#8221; for general information regarding promises to give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/18/conditional-promises-to-give/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unconditional Promises to Give</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/07/unconditional-promises-to-give/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/07/unconditional-promises-to-give/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Perkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't/United Way Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Schools and Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public/Private Foundations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pledges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promises to give]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A promise to give is a written or oral agreement to contribute cash or other assets to another entity. To be recognized in GAAP financial statements, you must have sufficient evidence that a promise to give was made and received. Sufficient evidence must be in the form of verifiable documentation such as a pledge card or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A promise to give is a written or oral agreement to contribute cash or other assets to another entity. To be recognized in GAAP financial statements, you must have sufficient evidence that a promise to give was made and received. Sufficient evidence must be in the form of verifiable documentation such as a pledge card or written agreement. Oral promises to give may be substantiated by tape recordings, written registers or other means that permit verification.        </p>
<p>Promises to give can be unconditional or conditional. Unconditional promises to give are exactly that: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unconditional (no strings attached)</span>. Once received, they can be used toward the ongoing operations or mission of the not-for-profit organization. </p>
<p>The timing of recognition of contribution revenue or receivable depends upon the promise to give being unconditional or conditional. Unconditional promises to give are recognized when received, even if the donor restricts the promised contribution for use in a future period and even if the promise will not be paid until a future period. If the promise to give is restricted for use in a future period or won’t be paid until a future period, it should be reported as restricted support, either temporary or permanent. </p>
<p>Contributions received should be measured at their fair values.  If the promise is expected to be collected in less than a year, it is measured at net realizable value, which in most cases would be the face value net of any estimated uncollectible amount. If the promise is expected to be collected after one year, the fair value should be based on future cash receipts, discounted at a rate “commensurate with the risks involved.”  Basically, the discount rate should be based on the same criteria that would be used for trade receivables.  The entity should consider the following factors:</p>
<ol>
<li>when the receivable is expected to be collected;</li>
<li>the creditworthiness of the other parties;</li>
<li>the entity&#8217;s past collection experience;</li>
<li>the entity’s policies concerning the enforcement of promises to give;</li>
<li>expectations about possible variations in the amount or timing of the cash flows; and</li>
<li>other factors concerning the receivable’s collectibility.</li>
</ol>
<p>Additional disclosures must be made regarding promises to give. When disclosing <strong>unconditional promises to give</strong>, you should disclose the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>the amount of promises receivable in less than one year, in one to five years, and in more than five years; and</li>
<li>the amount of the allowance for uncollectible promises receivable.</li>
</ol>
<p> <strong>Examples</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><em>Unconditional Disclosure 1:</em></p>
<p align="left">Unconditional promises to give are recorded as receivables and revenue when received. The Entity distinguishes between contributions received for each net asset category in accordance with donor-imposed restrictions. Pledges are recorded after being discounted to the anticipated net present value of the future cash flows.</p>
<p>              Pledges are expected to be realized in the following periods:</p>
<p align="left">                                                                                             <span style="text-decoration: underline;">     20X1     </span>     <span style="text-decoration: underline;">      20X0      </span></p>
<p>                    In one year or less                                                 $  1,438,547     $   1,313,217<br />
                    Between one year and five years                              <span style="text-decoration: underline;">   1,970,255</span>     <span style="text-decoration: underline;">     1,780,764</span><br />
                                                                                                 3,408,802          3,093,981<br />
                    Less:<br />
                        Allowance for uncollectible pledges                            (969,036)          (717,538)<br />
                        Discount, at 6%                                                 <span style="text-decoration: underline;">    (387,800</span>)    <span style="text-decoration: underline;">      (324,867</span>)<br />
                                                                                             <span style="text-decoration: underline;">$  2,051,966</span>     <span style="text-decoration: underline;">$   2,051,576</span></p>
<p><em></em><em>Unconditional Disclosure 2:</em></p>
<p align="left">The pledges receivable consist of operating and capital project fund-raising campaigns. At June 30, 20X1, all pledges receivable are expected to be collected during the next year. Management has determined that the pledges receivable are fully collectible; therefore, no allowance for uncollectible accounts are considered necessary at June 30, 20X1.</p>
<p align="left">For more information about conditional promises to give, watch for my next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/08/07/unconditional-promises-to-give/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classifying Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/04/17/classifying-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/04/17/classifying-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFAS 116]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contributions are received from multiple sources and may have unrestricted and restricted designations. The designation relates to the donor’s intent for the funds. If the donor does not specify how or when the funds are to be used, the contribution is classified as unrestricted support. These types of contributions ultimately increases unrestricted net assets. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contributions are received from multiple sources and may have unrestricted and restricted designations. The designation relates to the donor’s intent for the funds. If the donor does not specify <strong>how or when</strong> the funds are to be used, the contribution is classified as unrestricted support. These types of contributions ultimately increases unrestricted net assets.</p>
<p>If the donor stipulates that the funds are to be spent on a particular item/activity or within a particular period of time, then the contribution is temporarily restricted. If the contribution is never to be spent, as in the case of certain endowments, the contribution is permanently restricted, thus increasing permanently restricted net assets. These permanently restricted net assets generate investment income that can be spent, but the investment income may have donor restrictions to consider as well.</p>
<p>Recording a contribution increases cash and increases revenue. Therefore the asset account is debited and the revenue account is credited. The revenues are classified based on the donor’s intent. When the donor&#8217;s restriction has been met then the funds are released and classified as unrestricted support.</p>
<p>There are two different methods utilized in recording temporarily restricted revenues. The first method allows temporarily restricted contributions to be recorded as unrestricted support if the purpose or timing is met in the same year as the receipt.  The second method requires the full amount of temporarily restricted contributions to be recorded as restricted support when received and then released as the restriction has been met.</p>
<p>For more information on recording and classifying contributions, see FAS 116, <em>Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/04/17/classifying-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conditional vs. Unconditional Promises to Give &#8211; What is the Difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/03/10/conditional-vs-unconditional-promises-to-give-what-is-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/03/10/conditional-vs-unconditional-promises-to-give-what-is-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Donna Mayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't/United Way Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Schools and Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributions receivable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pledges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promises to give]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a former employee of a not-for-profit organization, we always got excited when we learned of a pledge (also known as a promise to give) from a generous donor. What can be difficult to understand is what you do with that information. There are two kinds of pledges and the treatment of each is different. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former employee of a not-for-profit organization, we always got excited when we learned of a pledge (also known as a promise to give) from a generous donor. What can be difficult to understand is what you do with that information. There are two kinds of pledges and the treatment of each is different.</p>
<p>1. Unconditional promises to give are statements by a donor of their intent to make a contribution of some kind at a future period. (For example, the ABC Foundation informs you that they have voted at their last Board meeting to give your organization $10,000 in January.)<br />
2. Conditional promises to give are pledges by a donor that are “conditioned” upon some other event (other than the passage of time) occurring. (Some examples are: 1). A donor states that he will give you $5,000 for your capital campaign <strong>if</strong> a contract with a builder has been signed. 2). A foundation will contribute $100,000 <em>if</em> a new program is implemented. 3). A corporation will donate $1,000 <strong>if</strong> other corporations in your community do the same.)</p>
<p>Remember: Conditional pledges require some other action to occur.</p>
<p>So what is the different accounting treatment?</p>
<p><span id="more-776"></span>1. Unconditional pledges are recorded as revenue (which is temporarily restricted – see <a href="http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/01/01/temporarily-restricted-contributions/">blog</a> on this topic) when the not-for-profit organization receives the pledge (written or verbal).<br />
2. Conditional pledges are recorded as revenue when the condition has been met. Until that time, the conditional pledge would be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements (if significant), but not reflected in the accounting records. [For example, you learn on December 1, 2008 that a donor is going to contribute $1 million for your organization to begin an endowment <strong>if</strong> you are able to establish a location in another town by December 1, 2009. In the financial statements ending December 31, 2008, this information would be disclosed in the footnotes. On March 31, 2009 the location is opened, and at that time you would recognize the pledge and the associated revenue of $1 million even if payment has not actually occurred.]</p>
<p>Pledge information can be conveyed to you verbally or in writing. However, we suggest that all significant pledges be obtained from the donor in writing stipulating any restrictions, date payment is to be expected, any conditional information, etc. This practice helps to reduce any confusion or errors.</p>
<p>If the donor does not send this written information, then we suggest that you write the donor an acknowledgement of their pledge and outline the verbal specifications. Ask the donor to sign a copy of the letter and return it to you.</p>
<p>Sometimes it can be unclear when the condition of the pledge has been met and should be recorded in your accounting records. If you have questions regarding this recognition, give us a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/03/10/conditional-vs-unconditional-promises-to-give-what-is-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temporarily Restricted Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/01/01/temporarily-restricted-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/01/01/temporarily-restricted-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky DaVee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov't/United Way Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Schools and Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFAS 116]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionaccountable.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even donors to nonprofit organizations are looking for a return on their investments. The return is in the form of the contribution being used for a specified purpose within the organization’s scope of activities. A donor may require that the contribution not be used until a project has reached a predetermined goal or threshold. These [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even donors to nonprofit organizations are looking for a return on their investments. The return is in the form of the contribution being used for a specified purpose within the organization’s scope of activities. A donor may require that the contribution not be used until a project has reached a predetermined goal or threshold. These donor restrictions require nonprofits to segregate these contributions as temporarily restricted assets until the specified conditions have been met. When the restrictions are met in the same year as the donation, the revenue is recorded as unrestricted support. When a donor restriction expires, that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is accomplished, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions.</p>
<p>If material, the components of temporarily restricted net assets and the amounts released are disclosed in the footnotes of the financial statements.</p>
<p>Authored by Tishia Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionaccountable.com/2009/01/01/temporarily-restricted-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

