Compliance Requirements for UPMIFA

By Ashlee Hendricks | Trackback URL No Comments »
Ashlee Hendricks

The State of Texas adopted the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) effective September 1, 2007.  UPMIFA replaces the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) which was approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1972 and adopted by the State of Texas in 1989.

UPMIFA was developed to improve the protection of donor intent with respect to expenditures from endowments and applies to charities organized as charitable trusts or as nonprofit corporations and trusts managed by charities. The Act does not apply to funds managed by trustees that are not charities or trusts managed by corporate or individual trustees. UPMIFA provides guidance and authority to charitable organizations concerning the management and investment of funds held by those organizations and imposes additional duties on those who manage and invest charitable funds to provide additional protection for charities and also protect the interests of donors who want to see their contributions used wisely. The Act updates the rules governing expenditures from endowment funds, whether donor restricted or board designated, to provide stricter guidelines on spending endowment funds and to give institutions the ability to cope more easily with fluctuations in the value of the endowment.

In addition to identifying factors that a charity must consider in making management and investment decisions, UPMIFA requires a charity and those who manage and invest its funds to 1) give primary consideration to donor intent as expressed in a gift instrument, 2) act in good faith, with the care an ordinarily prudent person would exercise, 3) incur only reasonable costs in investing and managing charitable funds, 4) make a reasonable effort to verify relevant facts, 5) make decisions about each asset in the context of the portfolio of investments, as part of an overall investment strategy, 6) diversify investments unless due to special circumstances, the purposes of the fund are better served without diversification, 7) dispose of unsuitable assets, and 8) in general, develop an investment strategy appropriate for the fund and the charity.

Has your organization adopted an investment policy that complies with your state’s version of UPMIFA? Review your state’s requirements and make sure your policies conform to the prudent management of funds.

For additional information see http://www.upmifa.org.

For the State of Texas version of UPMIFA see http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/PR/htm/PR.163.htm

Categories: General Information, Governance
Tags: , ,

Survey on Contributions

By Jay Shellum | Trackback URL No Comments »
Jay Shellum

Let’s be really honest – year-end giving wasn’t exactly what we hoped for. In a recent study conducted by the Barna Group, 57% of pastors surveyed said the economy had negatively impacted their church compared to last year. The good news is that only 8% of church leaders said the economic impact was “very negative,” and 9% actually described last year as financially positive. Even if your not one of the 57%, you’re probably not as comfortable going into 2010 as you’d like to be.

So what can churches do to weather this environment? Here’s a few suggestions: Read the rest of this entry »

Categories: Fundraising, Operational Issues, Religious Organizations
Tags: , , ,

Conditional Promises to Give

By Kimberly Downs | Trackback URL No Comments »
Kimberly Downs

As discussed in “Unconditional Promises to Give” post, promises to give can be unconditional or conditional. Conditional promises to give come with donor-imposed conditions. If the condition is not met, the donor is not obligated to fulfill the promise to give. If the donor has already fulfilled the promise but the condition is never met, the donor has a right to have the assets returned to them.

Conditional promises to give are recognized only when the conditions are satisfied. Therefore, no revenue or receivable should be recognized at the time the promise is received. If any assets are received prior to the conditions being met, the assets should be accounted for as a refundable advance (liability). Once the condition is met, the liability is removed and revenue is recognized.

Additional disclosures must be made regarding promises to give. When disclosing conditional promises to give, you should disclose the following:

  1. the total of the amounts promised; and
  2. a description and amount for each group of promises having similar characteristics, such as promises conditioned on establishing new programs, completing a new building, or raising matching gifts by a specified date. Read the rest of this entry »
Categories: Assets, Contributions, Definitions, Financial Reporting, Gov't/United Way Agencies, Private Schools and Universities, Public/Private Foundations, Religious Organizations
Tags: , ,

Unconditional Promises to Give

By Kimberly Downs | Trackback URL No Comments »
Kimberly Downs

A promise to give is a written or oral agreement to contribute cash or other assets to another entity. To be recognized in GAAP financial statements, you must have sufficient evidence that a promise to give was made and received. Sufficient evidence must be in the form of verifiable documentation such as a pledge card or written agreement. Oral promises to give may be substantiated by tape recordings, written registers or other means that permit verification.        

Promises to give can be unconditional or conditional. Unconditional promises to give are exactly that: unconditional (no strings attached). Once received, they can be used toward the ongoing operations or mission of the not-for-profit organization. 

The timing of recognition of contribution revenue or receivable depends upon the promise to give being unconditional or conditional. Unconditional promises to give are recognized when received, even if the donor restricts the promised contribution for use in a future period and even if the promise will not be paid until a future period. If the promise to give is restricted for use in a future period or won’t be paid until a future period, it should be reported as restricted support, either temporary or permanent. 

Contributions received should be measured at their fair values.  If the promise is expected to be collected in less than a year, it is measured at net realizable value, which in most cases would be the face value net of any estimated uncollectible amount. If the promise is expected to be collected after one year, the fair value should be based on future cash receipts, discounted at a rate “commensurate with the risks involved.”  Basically, the discount rate should be based on the same criteria that would be used for trade receivables.  The entity should consider the following factors:

  1. when the receivable is expected to be collected;
  2. the creditworthiness of the other parties;
  3. the entity’s past collection experience;
  4. the entity’s policies concerning the enforcement of promises to give;
  5. expectations about possible variations in the amount or timing of the cash flows; and
  6. other factors concerning the receivable’s collectibility.

Additional disclosures must be made regarding promises to give. When disclosing unconditional promises to give, you should disclose the following:

  1. the amount of promises receivable in less than one year, in one to five years, and in more than five years; and
  2. the amount of the allowance for uncollectible promises receivable.

 Examples

 Unconditional Disclosure 1:

Unconditional promises to give are recorded as receivables and revenue when received. The Entity distinguishes between contributions received for each net asset category in accordance with donor-imposed restrictions. Pledges are recorded after being discounted to the anticipated net present value of the future cash flows.

              Pledges are expected to be realized in the following periods:

                                                                                                  20X1                20X0     

                    In one year or less                                                 $  1,438,547     $   1,313,217
                    Between one year and five years                                 1,970,255          1,780,764
                                                                                                 3,408,802          3,093,981
                    Less:
                        Allowance for uncollectible pledges                            (969,036)          (717,538)
                        Discount, at 6%                                                     (387,800)          (324,867)
                                                                                             $  2,051,966     $   2,051,576

Unconditional Disclosure 2:

The pledges receivable consist of operating and capital project fund-raising campaigns. At June 30, 20X1, all pledges receivable are expected to be collected during the next year. Management has determined that the pledges receivable are fully collectible; therefore, no allowance for uncollectible accounts are considered necessary at June 30, 20X1.

For more information about conditional promises to give, watch for my next post.

Categories: Assets, Contributions, Definitions, Financial Reporting, Gov't/United Way Agencies, Private Schools and Universities, Public/Private Foundations, Religious Organizations
Tags: , ,

Classifying Contributions

By Susan White | Trackback URL Comments Off
Susan White

Contributions are received from multiple sources and may have unrestricted and restricted designations. The designation relates to the donor’s intent for the funds. If the donor does not specify how or when the funds are to be used, the contribution is classified as unrestricted support. These types of contributions ultimately increases unrestricted net assets.

If the donor stipulates that the funds are to be spent on a particular item/activity or within a particular period of time, then the contribution is temporarily restricted. If the contribution is never to be spent, as in the case of certain endowments, the contribution is permanently restricted, thus increasing permanently restricted net assets. These permanently restricted net assets generate investment income that can be spent, but the investment income may have donor restrictions to consider as well.

Recording a contribution increases cash and increases revenue. Therefore the asset account is debited and the revenue account is credited. The revenues are classified based on the donor’s intent. When the donor’s restriction has been met then the funds are released and classified as unrestricted support.

There are two different methods utilized in recording temporarily restricted revenues. The first method allows temporarily restricted contributions to be recorded as unrestricted support if the purpose or timing is met in the same year as the receipt.  The second method requires the full amount of temporarily restricted contributions to be recorded as restricted support when received and then released as the restriction has been met.

For more information on recording and classifying contributions, see FAS 116, Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made.

Categories: Definitions, Financial Reporting
Tags: ,

Conditional vs. Unconditional Promises to Give – What is the Difference?

By Donna Mayes | Trackback URL No Comments »
Donna Mayes

As a former employee of a not-for-profit organization, we always got excited when we learned of a pledge (also known as a promise to give) from a generous donor. What can be difficult to understand is what you do with that information. There are two kinds of pledges and the treatment of each is different.

1. Unconditional promises to give are statements by a donor of their intent to make a contribution of some kind at a future period. (For example, the ABC Foundation informs you that they have voted at their last Board meeting to give your organization $10,000 in January.)
2. Conditional promises to give are pledges by a donor that are “conditioned” upon some other event (other than the passage of time) occurring. (Some examples are: 1). A donor states that he will give you $5,000 for your capital campaign if a contract with a builder has been signed. 2). A foundation will contribute $100,000 if a new program is implemented. 3). A corporation will donate $1,000 if other corporations in your community do the same.)

Remember: Conditional pledges require some other action to occur.

So what is the different accounting treatment?

Read the rest of this entry »

Categories: Assets, Contributions, Definitions, Financial Reporting, Fundraising, Gov't/United Way Agencies, Private Schools and Universities, Religious Organizations
Tags: , , , , ,

Temporarily Restricted Contributions

By Becky DaVee | Trackback URL 2 Comments »
Becky DaVee

Even donors to nonprofit organizations are looking for a return on their investments. The return is in the form of the contribution being used for a specified purpose within the organization’s scope of activities. A donor may require that the contribution not be used until a project has reached a predetermined goal or threshold. These donor restrictions require nonprofits to segregate these contributions as temporarily restricted assets until the specified conditions have been met. When the restrictions are met in the same year as the donation, the revenue is recorded as unrestricted support. When a donor restriction expires, that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is accomplished, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions.

If material, the components of temporarily restricted net assets and the amounts released are disclosed in the footnotes of the financial statements.

Authored by Tishia Jordan

Categories: Financial Reporting, Gov't/United Way Agencies, Private Schools and Universities, Religious Organizations
Tags: ,