Starting in 2009, exempt organizations must adopt Fin 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. According to FASB, adopting FIN 48 is supposed to enhance the transparency of the exempt organization’s activities, much like the IRS’s intentions with the new Form 990. Implementing FIN 48 means exempt organizations are expected to analyze various areas of their operations and disclose any potential tax that may be assessed on uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 analyses may be necessary in many different areas such as state taxation and asset transactions, but a few target areas for all organizations are the purpose and activities, generation of unrelated business income, and excessive compensation arrangements.

FIN 48 will force a closer look at the source of the organization’s funds and the organization’s tax exempt purpose. Analysis in this area is necessary because if the organization strays from its exempt purpose, the income generated could become taxable. FIN 48 implementation requires that the risk of this happening be analyzed and any potential taxes be disclosed. 

This goes along with the second target area, classification of unrelated business income and management’s devotion of time to raising funds unrelated to the exempt purpose. Income unrelated to the exempt purpose of the organization should be taxable and whether or not income is classified as “unrelated” is a tax position. The potential tax liability arising from classifying income as unrelated business income requires a FIN 48 disclosure. 

The last generally applicable target area for exempt organizations is excessive compensation arrangements. If a compensation arrangement is found to be excessive it can result in excise taxes or jeopardize the tax exempt status of the organization. Compensation policies and practices will require analysis and possibly a FIN 48 disclosure of potential tax liability. 

Posted by Jamye Shaffer
RCO – Tax Senior

FIN 48 is an accounting standard that publicly traded companies have been complying with since 2007. Due to many comments and concerns about the standard, the implementation was delayed for nonpublic entities. FIN48 is an interpretation that clarifies accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, but more importantly, it changes the way that resulting liabilities are recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. When a tax return is completed, every answer or number is really a tax position. FIN48 asks the theoretical question, “would that tax position (either taken on a return or expected to be taken on a future return) stand up to examination by the IRS if they have full knowledge of the facts?”. 

Ok that is a bunch of tax talk. How can this standard affect tax-exempt organizations? The Financial Accounting Standards Board actually addressed that issue specifically, in a staff position paper issued last year. There are several FIN48 issues that can affect tax exempt agencies, but the most common are (1) performing services that are not consistent with the organization’s tax exempt purpose and (2) unrelated business income.

The first assessment of any tax position is whether or not the position is more likely than not to be upheld during an IRS examination. If the position would be upheld, then it is NOT an uncertain tax position and there is NO liability.  If the position cannot be upheld, then FIN48 requires a liability to be recorded and disclosed. The calculation of the liability is prescribed but allows some judgement. The recorded liability is the difference between the benefit recorded (full amount) and the amount that would be 50% or more likely to be allowed after the examination. The disclosure will identify this as an uncertain tax position, and will raise red flags for an IRS audit. As reported in the Journal of Accountancy, the IRS is currently proposing companies with more than $10 million of assets to disclose uncertain tax positions on their annual returns. 

Need help in determining what is considered an “uncertain tax position”? See our next post.

In my previous post we discussed external financial statement audits. Now we will discuss the audit process.

To begin the audit, the accountant (or equivalent) will present the auditor with a listing of all accounts and the related balances that are used to compile the financial statements. Basically, the accountant is saying this is what I believe to be the balances of these accounts. Then the auditor goes through various steps, such as confirming information with third parties, reviewing invoices, contracts, receipts, bank statements, and analytical procedures to prove that the balances are not “materially misstated” and that the statements conform to generally accepted accounting principles.

An audit does not look at every transaction that occurred during the year. Normally this would be cost prohibitive. So the auditor will look at various accounts and take a sample of transactions from those accounts. Because we “test” the account balances and not review 100%, our report is not saying that the financial statements are necessarily 100% accurate, but our report tells the users of the financial statements that we believe there is not a material misstatement that would cause you to alter a decision.

For example, your organization may report to us that they have a balance of accounts receivable of $2 million. Through various means of testing this balance, we have reviewed $1.9 million of this balance and believe it to be accurate. But we have not audited the remaining $100,000. We believe that the users of the financial statements would make the same decision if the actual balance were $2 million or $1.9 million. When errors are found during the audit, the auditors will discuss the issues with management and propose adjustments to the financial statements.

Understanding what an audit of financial statements entails helps management, Board of Directors and others to know what they are paying for and that the statements fairly represent the financial status of the organization. If the accountant uses the same generally accepted accounting principles to compile the monthly financial statements, this will help management and the Board of Directors make consistent, well-informed decisions.

One of the most critical tasks in monitoring and managing operations is to establish an annual budget. Whether you are responsible for one line item, one program, one department, or an entire organization, you will want to participate in this workshop held in the Fort Worth area, and sponsored by the Funding Information Center.

Participants will learn:

• The importance of sound budgeting
• The basic principles of budgeting
• How the budget is used as a planning and management tool
• Steps in the budgeting process
• How to develop various types of budgets, including programs and special events

Speaker: Christi Stinson, Executive Director, Funding Information Center
Fee: $20 for FIC members; $40 for nonmembers

Date: Tuesday February 16th, 2010

Time:  9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

Location: Funding Information Center
329 S. Henderson, Fort Worth, TX 76104
817-334-0228
To register, follow this link.

Let’s be really honest – year-end giving wasn’t exactly what we hoped for. In a recent study conducted by the Barna Group, 57% of pastors surveyed said the economy had negatively impacted their church compared to last year. The good news is that only 8% of church leaders said the economic impact was “very negative,” and 9% actually described last year as financially positive. Even if your not one of the 57%, you’re probably not as comfortable going into 2010 as you’d like to be.

So what can churches do to weather this environment? Here’s a few suggestions: Read the rest of this entry »

Today, the IRS released the following information – reminding organizations to properly file Form 990. According to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 non-profit organizations failing to file the required form for three consecutive years will automatically lose their federal tax-exempt status.

Mark your calendars and file the return, with extensions, if necessary.

Have questions? Give me a call.

Whether your annual audit is approaching or this will be your business’ first audit ever, an audit can seem like a daunting event. But there are ways to make this potentially painful event pass with minimal frustration:

10. Begin working on your schedules weeks before the audit occurs, you might have questions and your auditor is just a phone call or email away.
9. Keep track of issues you struggled with during the year. It will help the auditor key in on important areas at the beginning of the audit.
8. Get the confirmations back to the auditors quickly! The more time there is to send these out the better chance the auditor receives the accurate information. Not getting them back causes more work for all parties involved.
7. Communicate your schedule to the auditors. This helps the auditor work around your normal responsibilities.
6. Make all your adjustments to your trial balance before you provide it to the auditor.
5. Those schedules we talked about earlier make sure they tie to that final trial balance.
4. Make needed documentation easy to access and provide it to the auditors as soon as possible.
3. Be available! Here’s a tip, set aside time on your calendar devoted to auditor questions and audit prepwork.
2. Implement good segregation of duties among your staff. The more checks & balances you have the less likely you are to have errors or issues.
1. Don’t do anything fraudulent or misleading during the year. (Always a plus). Tell the truth.

The key to success is communication and preparedness. If you apply these steps you should see a reduction in the amount of friction an audit can cause.

It’s year-end and tax-exempt (T-E) organizations are preparing budgets for next year. In fact the budget process relating to expenses has probably been completed, however trying to estimate the revenue stream can be difficult. A number of churches utilize a pledge card to estimate contributions.

During the budget process expenses are reviewed and operations are monitored/analyzed, determining the effectiveness to the mission. Remember, all T-E organizations must continue to be organized and operate in accordance with it’s stated exempt purpose, as approved by the IRS (Form 1023).

Before the end of the fiscal year, department managers are usually asked to submit their budget for next year. Reviewing the current year disbursements, estimated costs for significant capital/program projects, revisions for personnel and related costs are just several of the key factors that must be considered.

To help the finance department and ultimately those charged with governance, churches may ask their congregants to complete a pledge card, indicating their intention to give. During this weekend, First United Methodist Church of Mansfield, accepted the annual “estimates of giving”. An estimate or an “intention to give” allows the church to collect and assess the level of contributions for the next year, without recording an unconditional promise to give. Remember conditional promises to give are recorded when collected (or when the condition has been met). Unconditional promises to give as recorded with the promise has been made by the donor.

So as your church prepares it’s annual budget, it’s o.k. to ask congregants for a giving estimate. This estimate allows management to prioritize capital expenditures and program services.

The IRS recognized the need for transition relief related to information included in Form 5500 by some 403(b) plans. It was noted that some of the filings would be rejected under ERISA because the filing would be incomplete due to the administrator’s inability to identify all participant contracts and accounts that should be included in plan assets. The filing would also be rejected if the audited financial statements contained an adverse, qualified or disclaimed opinion (other than disclaimers related to limited scope audit provisions in 29 C.F.R. 2520.103-8 or 103-12).

Administrators of 403(b) plans do not need to treat annuity contracts and custodial accounts as part of the employer’s plan assets for purposes of ERISA’s annual reporting requirements (further, the employer is not required to count the individual as a participant under the plan for Form 5500 reporting purposes) provided that:

1. The contract/account was issued to a current or former employee before 1/1/09
2. The employer ceased to have any obligation to make contributions and has ceased making contributions to the contract/account before 1/1/09
3. All of the rights and benefits under the contract/account are legally enforceable against the insurer or custodian by the individual owner without any involvement by the employer
4. The individual owner of the contract account is fully vested

The Department will not reject a Form 5500 on the basis of qualified, adverse or disclaimed opinion if the accountant expressly states that the sole reason for such an opinion was because such pre-2009 contracts/accounts were not covered by the audit or included in the plan’s financial statements.

The above information obtained from Field Assistance Bulletin 2009-02.

When completing the new Form 990, organizations are required to provide details about related organizations on Schedule R. An organization is a related organization to the filing organization if it stands in one or more of the following relationships to the filing organization:

1. Parent – an organization that controls the filing organization.
2. Subsidiary – an organization controlled by the filing organization.
3. Brother/Sister – an organization controlled by the same person or persons that control the filing organization.
4. Supporting/ Supported – an organization that is (or claims to be) at any time during the organization’s tax year, a supporting or supported organization within the meaning of section 509(a)(3) and 509(f)(3).

According to the IRS – the definition of control is:

1. Power to remove and replace a majority of a nonprofit organization’s directors or trustees,
   or
2. Management or board overlap where a majority of the controlled entity’s directors or trustees are trustees, directors, officers, employees, or agents of the controlling organization.

In the case of stock corporations, and other organizations with owners or persons having beneficial interests, whether such organization is taxable or tax-exempt, any of the following relationships represent control:

1. Ownership of more than 50% of the stock (by voting power or value) of a corporation.
2. Ownership of more than 50% of the profits or capital interest in a partnership.
3. Ownership of more than 50% of the profits or capital in a limited liability company (LLC ) treated as a partnership regardless of the designation under state law of the ownership interests as stock, membership shares or otherwise.
4. Being a managing partner or managing member in a partnership or LLC treated as a partnership which has three or fewer managing partners or managing members (regardless of which partner or member has the most actual control).
5. Being the sole member of a disregarded entity, (an entity wholly owned by the organization that is not a separate entity for Federal tax purposes).
6. Ownership of more than 50% of the beneficial interests in a trust.

What is considered indirect control? If the filing organization controls Entity A, which in turn controls Entity B, the filing organization will be treated as controlling Entity B also.

Sometimes it is difficult to determine “who” owns “what”. If you have questions, call us.