When I tell folks that I am an auditor, I immediately get that defensive look as they assume that I am a dreaded IRS auditor (which I am not). When I further explain that I audit financial statements, I usually receive a weak smile and a slight head nod, as if to signal that they are glad I am not with the IRS, but they really don’t have an idea what I do and are a little too embarrassed to ask or don’t really care. For those of you employed at non-profit organizations or serve on their Board of Directors, I thought I would take a few moments and explain what an audit of financial statements really entails. In a later post I will address who may need to have an audit.

So what is an audit of financial statements? Usually on a monthly basis, the controller, CFO, or accountant at your organization prepares financial statements, usually consisting of a balance sheet and income statement. These statements are used by staff, management and the Board of Directors to make decisions about the organization. But all of the information is gathered by and reported by people INTERNAL to the organization. A financial statement audit involves someone EXTERNAL to the organization, an independent certified public accountant.

Audits of financial statements are done according to a set of standards that all CPA’s must adhere to, which are referred to as Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). These standards have been developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and are monitored and revised based on financial circumstances, including failures related to fraud.

So how do we perform an audit? See my post, next month.

To ensure a Plan Sponsor is fulfilling their fiduciary obligations related to the oversight of an employee benefit plan I have listed some of the internal control matters that should be addressed (please note this is not an all inclusive list as facts and circumstances of each Plan vary):

1. Ensure all user control considerations included in the third party administrator’s (record-keeper, trustee, custodian, etc) Type II SAS 70 are in place at the Plan Sponsor
2. Analyze compliance testing results provided by the third party administrator and if the Plan failed any tests ensure that corrective action is taken in a timely manner (distributions or additional contributions to the Plan as necessary)
3. Determine if established internal controls are designed appropriately to catch errors or fraud that may occur during the processing of transactions related to the Plan. Consider conducting a brainstorming session with individuals involved in the Plan in determining what could go wrong and then determine if controls currently in place are adequate to address such risks.
4. If the census is prepared by the Plan Sponsor ensure that the total wages included in the census reconciles with the organizations payroll records (remember census must include all employees that received a paycheck during the year whether employed by the organization or not during the year); the census should also be reconciled with the record-keeper statements (employee contributions, employer contributions and loan repayments). Key point – A reconciled census that agrees with the Plan Sponsors audited financial statements and the record-keeper statements will save time and money during a benefit plan audit
5. Controls should be in place to ensure all information included on the participant statements (social security #, name, compensation, date of birth, date of hire and date of termination) is complete and accurate.  Inaccurate information could lead to:

• Allowing individuals to enter the plan when they were not eligible to do so or not allowing an employee into the plan that is in fact eligible.
• Inaccurate amounts being withheld for employee contributions and/or employer matching contributions.
• Inaccurate amounts being withheld or forfeited when an employee receives a distribution (early distribution tax penalties or issues related to utilizing the appropriate vesting percentage for employer contributions)

     6. Determine if the annual Form 5500 reconciles to the Plan’s financial statement’s

 Interested in refining your internal controls for benefit plan recordkeeping. More will come in a later blog post…

According to FIC’s December 9th electronic newsletter there are Ten Things Non-Profit Boards Should Think About (Soon). According to Steve Tatum, an attorney and partner with Cantey Hanger L.L.P., most members of non-profit boards are unaware of the potential for personal liability that became apparent in the recent case of Verret v. U.S.A., 542 F. Supp. 2d 526 (E.D. Tex. 2008) affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on February 26, 2009. The lower court opinion gave a very detailed account of the reasons why the board chairman of a non-profit hospital was held personally liable for payroll taxes the hospital owed but did not pay. See our previous post regarding this court case. It also provides some good ideas for at least minimizing the risks of board members being personally responsible for a potentially large bill from the IRS.

See full article here.

Need help with governance and regulatory compliance? Contact us.

The IRS recognized the need for transition relief related to information included in Form 5500 by some 403(b) plans. It was noted that some of the filings would be rejected under ERISA because the filing would be incomplete due to the administrator’s inability to identify all participant contracts and accounts that should be included in plan assets. The filing would also be rejected if the audited financial statements contained an adverse, qualified or disclaimed opinion (other than disclaimers related to limited scope audit provisions in 29 C.F.R. 2520.103-8 or 103-12).

Administrators of 403(b) plans do not need to treat annuity contracts and custodial accounts as part of the employer’s plan assets for purposes of ERISA’s annual reporting requirements (further, the employer is not required to count the individual as a participant under the plan for Form 5500 reporting purposes) provided that:

1. The contract/account was issued to a current or former employee before 1/1/09
2. The employer ceased to have any obligation to make contributions and has ceased making contributions to the contract/account before 1/1/09
3. All of the rights and benefits under the contract/account are legally enforceable against the insurer or custodian by the individual owner without any involvement by the employer
4. The individual owner of the contract account is fully vested

The Department will not reject a Form 5500 on the basis of qualified, adverse or disclaimed opinion if the accountant expressly states that the sole reason for such an opinion was because such pre-2009 contracts/accounts were not covered by the audit or included in the plan’s financial statements.

The above information obtained from Field Assistance Bulletin 2009-02.

Has your nonprofit organization ever considered lobbying activities? An organization exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) will lose its tax-exempt status and its qualification to receive deductible charitable contributions if a substantial part of its activities are carried on to influence legislation.

However, there are circumstances where lobbying is allowed for certain eligible 501(c)(3)s. Read the rest of this entry »

Hopefully those of you with calendar fiscal years are at least in the beginning stages of working on your budget for next year.  It’s probably about time to start thinking about it and making a plan. 

Before you start, I wanted to let you know about a common misconception that the total revenues have to equal total expenses on the budget. This is not true. You can budget for a surplus or a deficit. “But I’m a non-profit”, you say. Well it’s not a requirement of a tax-exempt nonprofit to end up with no money at the end of the year. The requirement is that any surpluses you do finish the year with, don’t go to stockholders or owners, the surpluses stay within the organization to continue its mission. Read the rest of this entry »

Final regulations that were adopted in 2007 take effect on January 1, 2009, for most tax-exempt organizations. 

What changed? How is your T-E organization affected?

The final regulations require all 403(b) providers, including churches, to have a plan document in place no later than 12/31/08. Failure to adopt a written plan before 1/1/09 will render all subsequent contributions to the plan to be fully taxable. The plan document must address several issues, including: Read the rest of this entry »

Anyone…at least that is how one should think when analyzing fraud risks.

Fraud is a hot topic. If you don’t think so ask someone who used to work for Enron or invested in Madoff’s investment company, they might change your mind. But, because of instances like these, people often think of fraud in large terms, and the mention of the words carries a lot of weight; when very often fraud occurs in all sizes and forms.

But, who is likely to commit fraud? Most people use what is commonly known as the fraud triangle to identify areas where one can commit fraud. The three criteria are Pressure/Incentive, Opportunity, and Rationalization.

The pressure/incentive trait is common with performance based jobs where there is motivation for employees to record false sales to meet sales/performance quotas or up their commission, or other incentive pay.

Opportunity rears its ugly head when an individual has too much control over one key process in a business. Let’s say a cashier at a bank did not have to reconcile the cash drawer at the end of the day. The “opportunity” is there for cash to be stolen without any knowledge of it being gone.

A big one in today’s economy is rationalization. This is commonly referred to as the “I deserve this,” mentality. Where an individual develops a frame of mind where they can justify their actions and commit the fraud even though it is outside their typical ethical guidelines. For example, the company is generating large revenue streams, but an employee needs money to pay for his kid’s summer baseball league; this employee could find themselves thinking “They won’t miss this money, and I can’t say no to my child.”

Now let’s not confuse fraud with honest mistakes, errors, or plain ignorance; there is a difference. Fraud is defined as “intentional” deception…intentional being the key word.

Stay tuned as we post methods to address these instances and help you to minimize fraud in your business.

Thanks in part to some hard work and outreach by the association community, Senator Grassley pulled his two amendments to the Finance Committee health care bill late Thursday night, meaning that no language regarding nonprofit governance or executive compensation will be contained in the Finance Committee bill. The numerous comments and letters shared by association executives from across the country helped educate members of the Finance Committee and the Senate about these issues, and we thank you for your support.

However, ASAE knows that this will not be the last time the nonprofit community will see this legislative language. Speaking to the Bureau of National Affairs, a Grassley aide said that although the Senator did not offer the amendments at this time, he is leaving open the option to offer them to another bill that has tax implications. It is important that the nonprofit community remain vigilant and ready to debate the issues of nonprofit governance and compensation whenever the debate is held.

For more information on these issues or to inquire how you can remain involved, contact ASAE’s Public Policy Department at (202) 626-2703 or publicpolicy@asaenet.org.

The above reprinted with permission.

The American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) published the following information in a recent alert to members. This should be of high interest to all tax-exempt organizations.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, has filed two amendments to the health care reform bill introduced by Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) that directly impact tax-exempt organizations. These amendments were filed along with more than 500 others before the end of last week, and are being considered in the markup of the Baucus bill that got underway Sept. 22.

Read the rest of this entry »