Starting in 2009, exempt organizations must adopt Fin 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. According to FASB, adopting FIN 48 is supposed to enhance the transparency of the exempt organization’s activities, much like the IRS’s intentions with the new Form 990. Implementing FIN 48 means exempt organizations are expected to analyze various areas of their operations and disclose any potential tax that may be assessed on uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 analyses may be necessary in many different areas such as state taxation and asset transactions, but a few target areas for all organizations are the purpose and activities, generation of unrelated business income, and excessive compensation arrangements.

FIN 48 will force a closer look at the source of the organization’s funds and the organization’s tax exempt purpose. Analysis in this area is necessary because if the organization strays from its exempt purpose, the income generated could become taxable. FIN 48 implementation requires that the risk of this happening be analyzed and any potential taxes be disclosed. 

This goes along with the second target area, classification of unrelated business income and management’s devotion of time to raising funds unrelated to the exempt purpose. Income unrelated to the exempt purpose of the organization should be taxable and whether or not income is classified as “unrelated” is a tax position. The potential tax liability arising from classifying income as unrelated business income requires a FIN 48 disclosure. 

The last generally applicable target area for exempt organizations is excessive compensation arrangements. If a compensation arrangement is found to be excessive it can result in excise taxes or jeopardize the tax exempt status of the organization. Compensation policies and practices will require analysis and possibly a FIN 48 disclosure of potential tax liability. 

Posted by Jamye Shaffer
RCO – Tax Senior

When there are only a few staff in an organization, it is very difficult to obtain the appropriate level of segregating duties.

In January 2010, Carl Ho, CPA posted an article on Blue Avocado (http://www.blueavocado.org) titled “Five Internal Controls for the Very Small Nonprofit” that gives some insight as to what the most important controls are for small organizations. The most important controls relate to checks and balances. Establishing a “tone at the top” so that policies are in place and all employees including management follow them. Other importants considerations include clearly defined responsibilities, locking up checks, using protected passwords on computers, having two people count cash together, reconciling bank statements timely, review of reconciliations or bank statements by someone other than the bookkeeper or preparer, requiring two signatures on checks, and not allowing the bookkeeper to be a check signer. Even with these procedures in place, fraud can occur if there is collusion or if management circumvents the policies or controls. For the full article visit, http://www.blueavocado.org/content/five-internal-controls-very-small-nonprofit.

Governance plays a significant part in the control environment. Listed below are a few links from the IRS website regarding governance practices for non-profit organizations.

Governance and Tax-Exempt Organizations – Examination Materials

http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=216068,00.html

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/governance_check_sheet.pdf

Governance of Charitable Organizations and Related Topics

http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=178221,00.html

FIN 48 is an accounting standard that publicly traded companies have been complying with since 2007. Due to many comments and concerns about the standard, the implementation was delayed for nonpublic entities. FIN48 is an interpretation that clarifies accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, but more importantly, it changes the way that resulting liabilities are recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. When a tax return is completed, every answer or number is really a tax position. FIN48 asks the theoretical question, “would that tax position (either taken on a return or expected to be taken on a future return) stand up to examination by the IRS if they have full knowledge of the facts?”. 

Ok that is a bunch of tax talk. How can this standard affect tax-exempt organizations? The Financial Accounting Standards Board actually addressed that issue specifically, in a staff position paper issued last year. There are several FIN48 issues that can affect tax exempt agencies, but the most common are (1) performing services that are not consistent with the organization’s tax exempt purpose and (2) unrelated business income.

The first assessment of any tax position is whether or not the position is more likely than not to be upheld during an IRS examination. If the position would be upheld, then it is NOT an uncertain tax position and there is NO liability.  If the position cannot be upheld, then FIN48 requires a liability to be recorded and disclosed. The calculation of the liability is prescribed but allows some judgement. The recorded liability is the difference between the benefit recorded (full amount) and the amount that would be 50% or more likely to be allowed after the examination. The disclosure will identify this as an uncertain tax position, and will raise red flags for an IRS audit. As reported in the Journal of Accountancy, the IRS is currently proposing companies with more than $10 million of assets to disclose uncertain tax positions on their annual returns. 

Need help in determining what is considered an “uncertain tax position”? See our next post.